Hill v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility

Filing 18

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 6 . Case is recommitted to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 5/8/12. (do1)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

DAVID TYRONE HILL,
Plaintiff
v.

C-1-12-63

WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,
Defendant

ORDER
This

matter

is

before

the

Court

upon

the

Report

and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 6) to
which neither party has objected.
Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge
has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to
the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any
objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted.

2

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Judge (doc. no. 6) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY
REFERENCE.

Plaintiff’s allegations pertaining to deficiencies in the

grievance procedure at Southern Ohio Correctional Facility are
DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b).
This case is RECOMMITTED to the United States Magistrate Judge
for further proceedings according to law.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Herman J. Weber
Herman J. Weber, Senior Judge
United States District Court