Sheppard v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Filing 45

ORDER - This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner's Second Motion to Modify Scheduling Order and Extend the Time to Amend or Supplement His Method-of-Execution Claims (Doc. No. 44). To protect the Warden's right to be heard on this Motion without prejudicing Petitioner's opportunity to plead, Petitioner's obligation to file an amendment or supplement to his method-of-execution claims is hereby SUSPENDED until a date to be set by the Court in ruling on the pending Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/22/2014. (kpf1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI BOBBY T. SHEPPARD, : Petitioner, Case No. 1:12-cv-198 : District Judge Gregory L. Frost Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz -vsNORMAN ROBINSON, Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, : Respondent. ORDER This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner’s Second Motion to Modify Scheduling Order and Extend the Time to Amend or Supplement His Method-of-Execution Claims (Doc. No. 44). In compliance with S. D. Ohio Civ. R. 7.3, Petitioner reports that the Warden opposes the Motion. Id. at PageID 471. Petitioner notes that the Court previously granted an extension of time to and including October 2, 2014. Id. at PageID 472. The Motion seeking that extension was, however, unopposed (Doc. No. 43). Under S. D. Ohio Civ. R. 7.2, the Warden’s time for opposing the Second Motion to Modify does not expire until October 6, 2014. Assuming the Warden files on the due date, Petitioner’s reply will not be due until October 23, 2014. To protect the Warden’s right to be heard on this Motion without prejudicing Petitioner’s opportunity to plead, Petitioner’s obligation -1- to file an amendment or supplement to his method-of-execution claims is hereby SUSPENDED until a date to be set by the Court in ruling on the pending Motion. September 22, 2014. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?