Best v. Mobile Streams, Inc. et al

Filing 86

ORDER that defendants shall file responses to plaintiff's 62 MOTION to file a second amended complaint on or before 2/6/2013; plaintiff has until 2/20/2013 to file a reply memorandum. Any other responsive or reply briefs regarding other motions currently before the Court are stayed pending this Court's ruling on plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/23/2013. (art)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION BLAKE BEST, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:12-cv-564 v. Barrett, J. Litkovitz, M.J. MOBILE STREAMS, INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court following a telephone status conference held on January 23, 2013 before the undersigned magistrate judge. As discussed in the conference, plaintiffhas not obtained counsel and will be proceeding pro se in prosecuting this lawsuit. Consequently, the Court sets the following briefing schedule on plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint (Doc. 62). Defendants shall file responses to plaintiffs motion on or before February 6, 2013; plaintiff has until February 20, 2013 to file a reply. Any other responsive or reply briefs regarding other motions currently before the Court are stayed pending this Court's ruling on plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: r,i?tJ,/.3 ~ ~~ ~ยท Karen L. Litkovitz United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?