Luis v. Zang et al
Filing
210
ORDER adopting #196 Report and Recommendations plaintiffs construed motion to further amend his complaint (Doc. 189) is GRANTED IN PART and otherwise DENIED. Plaintiffs motion to amend is GRANTED, but limited to the claims reflected in Counts I, II, V, and VII in Doc. 189-1 against the single Defendant Awareness Technologies, Inc.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 9/8/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Javier Luis,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
Awareness Technologies,
Defendant(s).
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case Number: 1:12cv629
Judge Susan J. Dlott
ORDER
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States
Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge
reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on March 28, 2017 a Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 196). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and
Recommendation (Docs. 197 and 199). Plaintiff then filed a motion to file amended objections
(Doc. 200) which the Court granted. Plaintiff did not file any additional objections, however, he
filed another motion for leave to file amended objections ( Doc. 201) which is DENIED.
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and
considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the
Court does determine that such Recommendations should be adopted.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s construed motion to further amend his complaint (Doc. 189) is
GRANTED IN PART and otherwise DENIED. Plaintiff’s motion to amend is GRANTED, but
limited to the claims reflected in Counts I, II, V, and VII in Doc. 189-1 against the single
Defendant Awareness Technologies, Inc. All other claims in the tendered amended complaint
are DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___s/Susan J. Dlott___________
Judge Susan J. Dlott
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?