Luis v. Zang et al
Filing
63
ORDER: Defendant Zang General Contractors, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue or, in the Alternative, for Transfer of Venue #43 and Defendants Joseph Zang's and Joseph Zang Custom Builders' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue or, in the Alternative, for Transfer of Venue #44 are GRANTED to the extent that the Court transfers this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The Clerk is directed to effect transfer as outlined above and, thereafter, to close this case. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 8/20/2012. (KAK) [Transferred from Florida Middle on 8/21/2012.]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
JAVIER LUIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No.
8:12-cv-500-T-33AEP
CARLA BERGMANN, ET AL.,
Defendants.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court pursuant to Defendant
Zang General Contractors, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of
Personal
Jurisdiction
and
Improper
Venue
or,
in
the
Alternative, for Transfer of Venue (Doc. # 43) and Defendants
Joseph Zang’s and Joseph Zang Custom Builders’ Motion to
Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue
or, in the Alternative, for Transfer of Venue (Doc. # 44),
both filed on July 30, 2012.
Plaintiff was given an opportunity to respond to the
Motions but failed to do so.
As of the date of this Order,
the time for Plaintiff to respond to the Motions under the
Court’s
Local
Rules
has
elapsed.
The
Court
construes
Plaintiff’s failure to respond to the Motions as Plaintiff’s
assent to the relief requested in the Motions.
Accordingly, the Court grants the Motions by transferring
this action to the Southern District of Ohio where a related,
first-filed case is currently pending: Zang, et al. v. Zang,
et al., 1:11-cv-884-SJD (case filed December 17, 2011).
In
the Motions, Defendants have correctly asserted that venue is
not proper in this action as none of the Defendants reside in
Florida (in fact, each Defendant in this suit is located in
Ohio
with
the
exception
California corporation).
of
Awareness
Technologies,
a
In addition, the Court determines
that this district is not where “a substantial part of the
events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28
U.S.C. § 1391(b).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), which states, “[f]or the
convenience of the parties and witnesses, in the interest of
justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any
other district or division where it might have been brought,”
the Court hereby transfers this case to the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:
(1)
Defendant Zang General Contractors, Inc.’s Motion to
Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper
Venue or, in the Alternative, for Transfer of Venue (Doc.
-2-
# 43) and Defendants Joseph Zang’s and Joseph Zang Custom
Builders’
Motion
to
Dismiss
for
Lack
of
Personal
Jurisdiction and Improper Venue or, in the Alternative,
for Transfer of Venue (Doc. # 44) are GRANTED to the
extent that the Court transfers this case to the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.
(2)
The Clerk is directed to effect transfer as outlined
above and, thereafter, to close this case.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this
20th day of August 2012.
Copies to:
All Counsel of Record
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?