Lucas v. Telemarketer Calling From (407) 476-5680 and Other Telephone Numbers
Filing
255
DECISION AND ENTRY adopting the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 249 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/1/2020. (rrs)
Case: 1:12-cv-00630-TSB-SKB Doc #: 255 Filed: 12/01/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 3055
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
VINCENT LUCAS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
TELEMARKETER CALLING FROM
(407) 476-5680 AND OTHER
TELEPHONE NUMBERS, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 1:12-cv-630
Judge Timothy S. Black
Magistrate Judge Stephanie K.
Bowman
DECISION AND ENTRY
ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 249)
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United
States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the
Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on November 2, 2020,
submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 249). No objections were filed.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has
reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all
of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does
determine that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 249) should be and is hereby
adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated above:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 249) is ADOPTED;
Case: 1:12-cv-00630-TSB-SKB Doc #: 255 Filed: 12/01/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 3056
2. Defendant Fred Accuardi’s Answer to the Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 198)
is STRICKEN;
3. The Clerk shall enter a default against Fred Accuardi under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a)
on all remanded claims, based upon his failure to appear.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date:
12/1/2020
s/Timothy S. Black
Timothy S. Black
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?