Suttles v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 13 Report and Recommendation in all respects. The Court thus REMANDS this case pre-judgment under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for a hearing consistent with the mandates set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter until after the entry of final judgment after remand. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 7/9/2013. (km1)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

TAMMY SUTTLES,

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,

NO. 1:12-CV-00658

OPINION & ORDER

Defendant.
This

matter

is

before

the

Court

on

the

Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation, in which she recommends that
the decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff’s application
for Supplemental Security Income benefits be reversed because it
is not supported by substantial evidence in the record and that
the case be remanded pre-judgment under sentence six for, among
other things, consideration of new and material evidence (doc.
13).

No objections to her Report and Recommendation were filed.
Having reviewed this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636, the Court ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation (doc. 13) in all respects.

The Court thus

REMANDS this case pre-judgment under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. §
405(g) for a hearing consistent with the mandates set forth in
the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

1

Accordingly,

the Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter until after
the entry of final judgment after remand.

SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 9, 2013

s/S. Arthur Spiegel________________
S. Arthur Spiegel
United States Senior District Judge

2