Manufacturers Representatives Incorporated v. Internal Revenue Service

Filing 5

ORDER that plaintiff MRI secure counsel to represent it within 21 days of this order and counsel must enter an appearance on behalf of plaintiff MRI within that time. Failure to comply will result in a report and recommendation dismissing this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 10/4/12. (jl1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION MANUFACTURERS REPRESENTATIVES INC., Case No. 1:12-cv-749 Plaintiff, Dlott, C.J. Bowman, M.J. vs. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. ORDER On September 28, 2012, Manufacturers Representatives Incorporated (“MRI”) initiated this action by filing a complaint with jury demand against the Internal Revenue Service. (Doc. 1). The complaint was signed by Henry Carota, the President of MRI. Thus, it appears that Mr. Carota is attempting to bring this action on behalf of MRI rather than himself as an individual. It is well-settled that a corporation, partnership, or association cannot appear in federal court except through an attorney. See Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 202 (1993). See also Doherty v. American Motors Corp., 728 F.2d 334, 340 (6th Cir. 1984). There is no indication that Mr. Carota is an attorney licensed to practice law. Furthermore, it is insufficient that the person attempting to represent the corporation is an officer of the corporation. Reich v. Pierce, 45 F.3d 431, 1194 WL 709292, at *4, n.1 (6th Cir. Dec. 20, 1994) (citing Ginger v. Cohen, 426 F.2d 1385, 1386 (6thCir. 1970)); accord Kinder Capital, Inc. v. Unity Community, 85 F.3d 629, 1996 WL 229819, at *1 (6th Cir. May 6, 1996). Thus, Mr. Carota cannot represent the corporation 1 in this case. Plaintiff MRI must secure counsel to represent it in this case within twenty-one (21) days of the filing date of this Order, and counsel must enter an appearance on behalf of Plaintiff MRI within that time. Failure to comply with the terms of this Order will result in a Report and Recommendation to the District Judge that this case be dismissed as a result of MRI’s failure to appear in this matter through counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Stephanie K. Bowman Stephanie K. Bowman United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?