Knecht v. Cincinnati City of et al

Filing 95

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 88 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/16/2016. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER KNECHT, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF CINCINNATI, OHIO, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:12-cv-763 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 88) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on December 10, 2015, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 88). Plaintiff filed objections (Doc. 92) and the Defendant responded (Doc. 94). 1 The case is now ripe for review. As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does Plaintiff objects that: (1) his affidavit does not contain inadmissible hearsay; (2) the City is subject to a fine pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 20.25; and (3) discovery should have been reopened. Plaintiff’s objections are OVERRULED because: (1) his affidavit contains inadmissible hearsay; (2) 28 C.F.R. § 20.25 does not provide for fines where innocently inaccurate criminal history information is self-corrected pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 20.21(a); and (3) Plaintiff had three years to obtain discovery before filing his untimely motion to reopen discovery. 1 determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 76) is GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 2/16/16 s/ Timothy S. Black Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?