Slagle v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution

Filing 29

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 25 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, the petitioners motion for relief from judgment (Doc. 24) is DENIED since the petitioner has not shown mistake or the excusable neglect that would entitle him for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott. (wam1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION John Wesley Slagle, Petitioner(s), vs. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution, Respondent(s). : : : : : : : : : Case Number: 1:12cv839 Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott ORDER This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on July 15, 2013 Report and Recommendations (Doc. 25). Subsequently, the petitioner filed objections to such Report and Recommendation ( Doc. 27) and respondent filed a response to the objections (Doc. 28). The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment (Doc. 24) is DENIED since the petitioner has not shown mistake or the excusable neglect that would entitle him for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. ___s/Susan J. Dlott___________ Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?