Reynolds & Reynolds Company v. Superior Integrated Solutions, Inc.

Filing 100

AGREED ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 2/28/14. (cib1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON THE REYNOLDS & REYNOLDS COMPANY, Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:12-cv-848 vs. SUPERIOR INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS, INC., District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman Defendant. AGREED ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS On February 28, 2014, the Court held an informal status conference, by phone, with counsel for Plaintiff, the Reynolds & Reynolds Company (“Reynolds”), and Defendant, Superior Integrated Solutions, Inc. (“SIS”) (collectively, the “Parties”). During this conference, the Parties jointly requested that the Court issue a temporary stay of all proceedings. Having considered this request and good cause having been shown, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) All proceedings are STAYED until March 7, 2014. The Parties are ORDERED to appear for a brief telephonic status conference on March 10, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.1 The following deadlines and scheduled events are rescheduled as follows: 2) Reynolds’ deadline to file a motion to dismiss or otherwise respond to SIS’s Amended Answer and Second Amended Counterclaim (doc. 89), which is currently February 28, 2014, is extended to March 7, 2014; 3) SIS’s deadline to file a reply brief in support of its Motion to Compel (doc. 87), which is currently March 3, 2014, is extended to March 10, 2014; and 4) The oral argument on SIS’s Motion to Compel (doc. 87), currently scheduled for March 5, 2014 at 2:00 p.m., shall be reset to March 13, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. February 28, 2014 1 /s Michael J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge The parties shall call 1-877-336-1839, enter access code 2725365 and security code 123456.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?