Reynolds & Reynolds Company v. Superior Integrated Solutions, Inc.
Filing
48
ORDER : The Court hereby ORDERS that the following submissions be made. Defendant shall submit its Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's motion to compel the production of documents (doc. 46 ) by October 14, 2013; Plaintiff shall submit its Reply Memorandum, if any, by October 18, 2013. Additionally, the production of documents not in dispute under the pending motion shall be made no later than October 18, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 10/7/2013. (ea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
REYNOLDS & REYNOLDS COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 1:12-CV-848
vs.
SUPERIOR INTEGRATED
SOLUTIONS, INC.
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
(Consent Case)
Defendant.
ORDER
The Court met with counsel for both sides on October 2, 2013 by telephone to hear oral
argument on the merits of Plaintiff’s motion to compel the production of documents (doc. 46).
The Court hereby ORDERS that the following submissions be made: Defendant shall submit its
Memorandum in Opposition by October 14, 2013; Plaintiff shall submit its Reply
Memorandum, if any, by October 18, 2013.
Additionally, the production of documents not in dispute under the pending motion shall
be made no later than October 18, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 7, 2013
s/ Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?