Reynolds & Reynolds Company v. Superior Integrated Solutions, Inc.

Filing 48

ORDER : The Court hereby ORDERS that the following submissions be made. Defendant shall submit its Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's motion to compel the production of documents (doc. 46 ) by October 14, 2013; Plaintiff shall submit its Reply Memorandum, if any, by October 18, 2013. Additionally, the production of documents not in dispute under the pending motion shall be made no later than October 18, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 10/7/2013. (ea)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON REYNOLDS & REYNOLDS COMPANY, Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:12-CV-848 vs. SUPERIOR INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS, INC. Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Consent Case) Defendant. ORDER The Court met with counsel for both sides on October 2, 2013 by telephone to hear oral argument on the merits of Plaintiff’s motion to compel the production of documents (doc. 46). The Court hereby ORDERS that the following submissions be made: Defendant shall submit its Memorandum in Opposition by October 14, 2013; Plaintiff shall submit its Reply Memorandum, if any, by October 18, 2013. Additionally, the production of documents not in dispute under the pending motion shall be made no later than October 18, 2013. IT IS SO ORDERED. October 7, 2013 s/ Michael J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?