Reynolds & Reynolds Company v. Superior Integrated Solutions, Inc.

Filing 82

ORDER - Having reconsidered the matter sua sponte, the Court believes oral argument should occur on Defendants motion for leave to file a second amended counterclaim (doc. 52 ) and Plaintiffs motion to strike (doc. 75 at PageID 1167). The Court i s sensitive to the cost of litigation; accordingly, such argument shall be held by telephone, not in-person. Argument shall occur this Friday, January 24, 2014, at 2:30 p.m. E.S.T. Counsel shall call 1-877-336-1839, enter Access code 2725365 and Security code 123456, and wait for the Court to join the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 01/22/14. (pb1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON THE REYNOLDS & REYNOLDS COMPANY, Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:12-CV-848 vs. SUPERIOR INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS INC., District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman Defendant. ORDER Having reconsidered the matter sua sponte, the Court believes oral argument should occur on Defendant’s motion for leave to file a second amended counterclaim (doc. 52) and Plaintiff’s motion to strike (doc. 75 at PageID 1167). The Court is sensitive to the cost of litigation; accordingly, such argument shall be held by telephone, not in-person. Argument shall occur this Friday, January 24, 2014, at 2:30 p.m. E.S.T. Counsel shall call 1-877-336-1839, enter Access code 2725365 and Security code 123456, and wait for the Court to join the conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. January 22, 2014 s/ Michael J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?