Pearson v. United Automobile Workers International Union et al

Filing 5

ORDER that the Court hereby extends for (60) days, the period within which plaintiff must serve defendants in this matter and show proof of service on the docket of the Court. Plaintiff's deadline set for 8/5/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/3/2013. (art)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION TIMOTHY L. PEARSON, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:12-cv-966 Beckwith, J. Litkovitz, M.J. vs. UNITED AUTOMOBILE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, et al., Defendants. ORDER On April 18, 2013, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause, in writing, within twenty (20) days why the complaint should not be dismissed against defendants for failure of service. (Doc. 2). This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs response to the show cause order. (Doc. 4). For good cause shown, the Court hereby extends for sixty (60) days the period within which plaintiff must serve defendants in this matter and show proof of service on the docket of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: ~~,__/- Karen L. Litkovitz ~~ United States Magistrate Judge SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1 , 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: 1:.-v\~ L. {>e,Of"..fe~ 77 > M~rrfj~r11a-y M_ X B. Received by (Printed Name) D. Is delivery address different from item 1? If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 0 Yes No z Unt+- 3S c~~~, (]6-{ ...., s-z :1 .~; 3. ~9"1ceType ~ertified Mail 0 Registered 0 Insured Mail 0 0 Express Mail Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extta Fee) 2. Article Number (rransfer from service label) PS Form 3811 , February 2004 7002 3150 DODD 8389 9616 D Yes

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?