Hess v. Miller Pipeline Corporation et al

Filing 27

CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The Court having been advised by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz that this case has successfully mediated and settled in the Courts presence; It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, prov ided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement. The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 10/1/2013. (mr1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
DIANNA HESS,

Case No.: 1:12-CV-983

Plaintiff,

Judge Timothy S. Black
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

vs.
MILLER PIPELINE
CORPORATION, et al,
Defendants.
__________________________
CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL
__________________________
The Court having been advised by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz that this
case has successfully mediated and settled in the Court’s presence;
It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided
that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, move to reopen the
action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to
substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement.
The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement
agreement of the parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 10/1/2013

_s/Timothy S. Black__________
Timothy S. Black
United States District Judge