Belcher v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility et al

Filing 27

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 25 ; denying as moot [13 & 23] Defendants' Motions to Dismiss; striking the complaint and dismissing the case with prejudice. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 10/29/13. (mb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION LARRY BELCHER, Plaintiff v. C-1-12-985 WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants ORDER This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 25) to which neither party has objected. Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted. The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 25) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, plaintiff’s Complaint (doc. no. 2 3) is stricken. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for want of prosecution. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint On the Ground it Is Deficient (doc. no. 13) and defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Lawsuit for Lack of Prosecution (doc. no. 23) are DENIED AS MOOT. This case is DISMISSED AND TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Herman J. Weber Herman J. Weber, Senior Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?