Craycraft v. Warden, Hocking Correctional Institution

Filing 29

JUDGMENT signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 11/6/14. IT IS ORDERED: The Report and Recommendations and the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 20 and 26) be, and hereby are, adopted as the findings of fact an d conclusions of law of this Court; that petitioners Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 2), is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is granted a certificate of appealability on the one ground for relief he pleads.ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 26 Report and Recommendations, 20 Report and Recommendations,,. Case Terminated. (eh1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv89 (WOB-MRM) JEREMIAH CRAYCRAFT PETITIONER VS. JUDGMENT WARDEN, HOCKING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY RESPONDENT This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendations and the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 20 and 26), and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by petitioner (Doc. 24 and 28), and the Court being sufficiently advised, IT IS ORDERED that the objections (Doc. 24 and 28) to the Report and Recommendations and Supplemental Report and Recommendations (Doc. 20 and 26) be, and hereby are, overruled. The Report and Recommendations and the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 20 and 26) be, and hereby are, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 2), is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is granted a certificate of appealability on the one ground for relief he pleads. This 6th day of November, 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?