Craycraft v. Warden, Hocking Correctional Institution
Filing
29
JUDGMENT signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 11/6/14. IT IS ORDERED: The Report and Recommendations and the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 20 and 26) be, and hereby are, adopted as the findings of fact an d conclusions of law of this Court; that petitioners Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 2), is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is granted a certificate of appealability on the one ground for relief he pleads.ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 26 Report and Recommendations, 20 Report and Recommendations,,. Case Terminated. (eh1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv89 (WOB-MRM)
JEREMIAH CRAYCRAFT
PETITIONER
VS.
JUDGMENT
WARDEN, HOCKING CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY
RESPONDENT
This matter is before the Court on the Report and
Recommendations and the Supplemental Report and Recommendations
of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 20 and 26), and
having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by
petitioner (Doc. 24 and 28), and the Court being sufficiently
advised,
IT IS ORDERED that the objections (Doc. 24 and 28) to the
Report and Recommendations and Supplemental Report and
Recommendations (Doc. 20 and 26) be, and hereby are, overruled.
The Report and Recommendations and the Supplemental Report and
Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 20 and 26) be, and
hereby are, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of
law of this Court; that petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of
Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 2), is
DISMISSED with prejudice.
Petitioner is granted a certificate
of appealability on the one ground for relief he pleads.
This 6th day of November, 2014.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?