Cecil v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 21 Report and Recommendation in all respects. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff's application for Supplemental Security Income ("SSI") on behalf of her grand son, T.C., which we find to be supported by substantial evidence such that remand for further consideration is not required, is AFFIRMED and the Court ORDERS that this case be closed on the docket. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 4/22/2014. (km1)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
WILMA CECIL, on behalf of
T.C.,

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.

No. 1:13-cv-00162

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the February 19, 2014
Report

and

Recommendation

Bowman (doc. 21).
under

28

U.S.C.

of

Magistrate

Judge

Stephanie

K.

Proper notice was provided to the parties
§

636(b)(1)(C)

and

Fed.

R.

Civ.

P.

72(b),

including the advice that they would waive further appeal if
they

failed

to

file

an

objection

to

said

Report

and

Recommendation in a timely manner. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S.
140, 155 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50
(6th Cir. 1981).

Plaintiff sought (doc. 22) and was granted

(doc. 23) an initial 14-day extension of time by which to file
her objections.

She then sought a second 14-day extension in

her pleading captioned “Plaintiff’s Final Motion to Extend Time
for Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation”
(doc. 24).

On March 27, 2014, we granted her motion, allowing
1

her until April 8, 2014 to file her objections (doc. 25).

To

date, no objections have been filed.
Having

reviewed

this

matter

pursuant

to

28

U.S.C.

§

636(b)(1), we conclude that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation is thorough, well-reasoned and correct, and thus
the

Court

ACCEPTS,

Accordingly,

the

ADOPTS
decision

and
of

AFFIRMS
the

it

in

all

Commissioner

respects.
to

deny

Plaintiff’s application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”)
on behalf of her grandson, T.C., which we find to be supported
by

substantial

evidence

such

that

remand

for

further

consideration is not required, is AFFIRMED and the Court ORDERS
that this case be closed on the docket.
SO ORDERED.

Dated:

April 22, 2014

s/S. Arthur Spiegel
S. Arthur Spiegel
United States Senior District Judge

2