Rose v. Sage

Filing 4

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 Complaint filed by J.R. Rose Objections to R&R due by 4/22/2013. It is therefore RECOMMENDED that: 1. The complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2)(B). 2. The Court cert ify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith, and therefore, deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 4/3/13. (lk)

Postage

1-$--------;

CertHiedFee

...=t

g

Return Receipt Fee
(Endorsement Required)

1----------1

CJ

Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)

1--------t

Total Postage & Fees

Postmar1<
Here

L$~-------'

0

~

m~~----~~r>~~~~~~------~

_ ©_s_t_ __5_.11:_1~L____________________
F-0. fuX. J1QD..._l_____r:·--------·--,- citY.Siaie::t~;;+;,-----CJi-i!Jr tcfFi"i~ off ,L J L£CI

~ ~~~:-~~------------J.R
!2 ~:,~e;;::·::.·;
:tt

••

...

.. ·-. -

.

CM/ECF LIVE- U.S. District Court:OHSD-Docket Activity Report

Page 7 of49

u

CAS REF
JURY
PROTO
REPLY to Response~on re 37 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to All
Claims filed by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Eldredge
Deposition Excerpts, # 2 Exhibit Zacharias Deposition Excerpts, # .3_ Exhibit
Shepherd Deposition Excerpts, # 1 Exhibit Busher Deposition Excerpts, # ~
Exhibit Carroll Deposition Excerpts) (Pensyl, Tyler)

1:09-cv-00604SJD
Cincinnati
Industrial
Machinery, Inc. v.
VMI Holland BV

Entered:
Category: respm
07/22/2011 Event: Reply to Response to
Motion
18:18:08 Document: 91 ~
Filed:
QC Status
07/22/2011 Not Reviewed

IIC. Griffith
IIType: aty

IICause: 28:1332
Diversity-Breach of
Contract
OS: Contract:
Other
Office: Cincinnati
Presider: Susan J.
Dlott
ury demand: Both
/~
Case Flags: JURY
/
PROTO
REPLY to Response.-tO'Motion re 83 MOTION for Discovery Pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(D) filed by Defendant VMI Holland BV.
(Griffith, Calvin)

1:09-cv-00617Entered: ''Category: order
07/22/2011 Event: Order on Motion for
WOB-SKB
Miscellaneous Relief
Mosser v. Watson
et al
14:18:07 Document: 54 ~
IFiled:
QC Status
07/22/2011 Not Reviewed

IIJ. Webster
Type: crt

v/
/

Cause: 42:1983
Civil Rights Act
INOS: Civil Rights:
Other
Office: Cincinnati
Presider: William 0.
Bertelsman
!Referral: Stephanie
K. Bowman
~ury demand:
Plaintiff
Case Flags:
APPEAL
CAS REF
DISC-ONLY
JURY

ORDER granting 50 Motion for 0 r in Support of Remand in order to Dismiss
State Law Claims.Plaintiff see o dismiss the state law false arrest, malicious
prosecution, and state law sault and battery claims against Defendants Watson
ased on immunity claims under O.R.C. Section 2744 is
and Shepard. An appe
pending in the Si
Circuit with respect to those claims. Pursuant to the
procedure o · ed in First National bank of Salem, Ohio v. Hirsch, 535 F.2d 343
(6th Cir. 1976), this Court hereby expresses its willingness to grant a motion to
dismiss the state law false arrest, malicious prosecution and state law assault and
battery claims against Defendants Watson and Shepard upon remand ofthese
claims to the District Court. Signed by William 0. Bertelsman on 7/22/2011.
!::::::======::::::!, (jlw)

https://ecf.ohsd.circ6.dcnlcgi-bin/DktActivityRpt.pl?112543248216603-L_1_0-1

7/26/2011