Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED in its entirety for want of prosecution and for failure to obey an Order of the Court. The Court certifies that an appeal of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith and therefore DENIES plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott on 5/23/14. (sct1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Clarence E. Brown, : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff(s), vs. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant(s). Case Number: 1:13cv234 Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott ORDER The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on April 11, 2014 (Doc. 15), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired April 28, 2014, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED in its entirety for want of prosecution and for failure to obey an Order of the Court. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that an appeal of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith and therefore DENIES plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v. United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274 (6th Cir. 1997). IT IS SO ORDERED. ___s/Susan J. Dlott___________ Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?