Whiteside v. Thalheimer et al

Filing 36

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 34 denying 22 WCI defendants' motion for a more definite statement and denying the parole board defendants' motion to dismiss; granting plaintiff's motions to amend the complaint. Plaintiff is to file an amended complaint by 9/15/14. This case is RECOMMITTED to the Mag. Judge. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 8/14/14. (mb) Modified on 8/14/2014 (mb).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION NORMAN V. WHITESIDE, Plaintiff v. C-1-13-408 TRAYCE THALHEIMER, et al., Defendants ORDER This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 34) to which neither party has objected. Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted. The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 34) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. Plaintiff’s Motion and Amended Motion to Amend his 2 Complaint (doc. nos. 25 and 26) are GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to file an Amended Complaint by September 15, 2014. The WCI Defendants' Motion for a More Definite Statement (doc. no. 23) is DENIED and the Parole Board Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 22) is DENIED. This case is RECOMMITTED to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings according to law. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Herman J. Weber Herman J. Weber, Senior Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?