Whiteside v. Thalheimer et al
Filing
36
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 34 denying 22 WCI defendants' motion for a more definite statement and denying the parole board defendants' motion to dismiss; granting plaintiff's motions to amend the complaint. Plaintiff is to file an amended complaint by 9/15/14. This case is RECOMMITTED to the Mag. Judge. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 8/14/14. (mb) Modified on 8/14/2014 (mb).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
NORMAN V. WHITESIDE,
Plaintiff
v.
C-1-13-408
TRAYCE THALHEIMER, et al.,
Defendants
ORDER
This
matter
is
before
the
Court
upon
the
Report
and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 34) to
which neither party has objected.
Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the
Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly
applied it to the particular facts of this case.
Accordingly, in the
absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as
uncontroverted.
The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Judge (doc. no. 34) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN
BY REFERENCE.
Plaintiff’s Motion and Amended Motion to Amend his
2
Complaint (doc. nos. 25 and 26) are GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to
file
an
Amended
Complaint
by
September
15,
2014.
The
WCI
Defendants' Motion for a More Definite Statement (doc. no. 23) is
DENIED and the Parole Board Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. no.
22) is DENIED.
This case is RECOMMITTED to the United States Magistrate Judge
for further proceedings according to law.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Herman J. Weber
Herman J. Weber, Senior Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?