Obergefell et al v. Kasich et al
Filing
55
Supplemental ANSWER to 33 Amended Complaint filed by Theodore Wymyslo, M.D.. (Coontz, Bridget)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
JAMES OBERGEFELL, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THEODORE E. WYMYSLO, M.D.,
Defendant.
:
: Case No. 1:13-cv-00501
:
: District Judge Timothy S. Black
:
:
:
:
:
DEFENDANT DIRECTOR OF THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, THEODORE
E. WYMYSLO, M.D’S SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT [DOC. NO. 33]
On November 1, 2013, this court denied Defendant Dr. Theodore E. Wymyslo’s motion
to dismiss the claims of Plaintiff Robert Grunn, (Doc. # 54). Accordingly, Defendant hereby
supplements his answer to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint as follows:
1.
Defendant does not dispute that Plaintiff Robert Grunn is a funeral director.
Defendant denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 6 of the Second Amended Complaint
for want of knowledge sufficient to form a belief.
2.
Defendant states that the allegations contained in Paragraph 41 of the Second
Amended Complaint are legal conclusions for which no response is required.
3.
Defendant does not dispute that Plaintiff Grunn signs death certificates as a
funeral director as alleged in Paragraph 42 of the Second Amended Complaint.
4.
Defendant denies allegations in Paragraph 43 of the Second Amended Complaint
for want of knowledge sufficient to form a belief.
5.
Defendant denies allegations in Paragraph 44 of the Second Amended Complaint
for want of knowledge sufficient to form a belief.
6.
Defendant denies allegations in Paragraph 45 of the Second Amended Complaint
for want of knowledge sufficient to form a belief.
7.
Defendant states that the allegations in Paragraph 46 of the Second Amended
Complaint are assertions for which no response is required. To the extent a response is required,
Defendant denies the allegations in Paragraph 46 for want of knowledge sufficient to form a
belief.
8.
Defendant states that the allegations in Paragraph 47 of the Second Amended
Complaint are legal conclusions to which no response is required.
9.
Defendant states that the allegations in Paragraph 48 of the Second Amended
Complaint are legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the extent any response is
required, Defendant denies the allegations in Paragraph 48 and expressly denies that Plaintiffs
are entitled to any relief. Answering further, Defendant denies that this Court has jurisdiction
over Mr. Grunn’s claims.
10.
Defendant states that the allegations in Paragraph 49 of the Second Amended
Complaint are legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the extent any response is
required, Defendant denies the allegations in Paragraph 49 and expressly denies that Plaintiffs
are entitled to any relief. Answering further, Defendant denies that Mr. Grunn has standing to
represent the interests of unascertained future clients and further denies that this Court has
jurisdiction over Mr. Grunn’s claims.
11.
Defendant denies all allegations not expressly admitted or specified as not
disputed.
2
12.
Defendant expressly incorporates all responses and defenses set forth in his
Answer to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (Doc. # 39).
WHEREFORE, having fully answered, Defendant Wymyslo submits that the Second
Amended Complaint should be dismissed.
Respectfully submitted,
MICHAEL DEWINE
Ohio Attorney General
/s/ Bridget E. Coontz
BRIDGET E. COONTZ (0072919)*
*Lead and Trial Counsel
ZACHERY P. KELLER (0086930)
Assistant Attorney General
Constitutional Offices Section
30 East Broad Street, 16th Floor
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Tel: (614) 466-2872; Fax: (614) 728-7592
bridget.coontz@ohioattorneygeneral.gov
zachery.keller@ohioattorneygeneral.gov
Counsel for Theodore E. Wymyslo, M.D., Director
of the Ohio Department of Health
3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that the foregoing document was filed electronically on November 15,
2013. Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court’s electronic filing
system.
/s/ Bridget E. Coontz
Bridget E. Coontz (0072919)*
Assistant Attorney General
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?