Chapman v. Lawson et al
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/23/13. It is ORDERED that the 4 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Claims against defendants Mark Tiereny, MikeKeeling, Dennis Helmick, Simon Leis, Jr., and James E. Craig are DISMISSED. Plaintiffs claims under the Fifth and Ninth Amendments and claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1988 are DISMISSED. (eh1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Charles Chapman,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:13cv652
Steven Lawson, et al.,
Judge Michael R. Barrett
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the
Magistrate Judge on November 19, 2013 (Doc. 4).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including
notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report
and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.
1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) have
been filed.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) of the
Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED.
Claims against defendants Mark Tiereny, Mike
Keeling, Dennis Helmick, Simon Leis, Jr., and James E. Craig are DISMISSED. See 28
U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b). Plaintiff’s claims under the Fifth and Ninth
Amendments and claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1988 are DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett
Michael R. Barrett
United States District Judge
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?