Chapman v. Lawson et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/23/13. It is ORDERED that the 4 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Claims against defendants Mark Tiereny, MikeKeeling, Dennis Helmick, Simon Leis, Jr., and James E. Craig are DISMISSED. Plaintiffs claims under the Fifth and Ninth Amendments and claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1988 are DISMISSED. (eh1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Charles Chapman, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:13cv652 Steven Lawson, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on November 19, 2013 (Doc. 4). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Claims against defendants Mark Tiereny, Mike Keeling, Dennis Helmick, Simon Leis, Jr., and James E. Craig are DISMISSED. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b). Plaintiff’s claims under the Fifth and Ninth Amendments and claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1988 are DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?