Ojile v. Warden, Correctional Reception Center
Filing
23
DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD - Petitioner Ugbe Ojile's Motion to Supplement the Record (Doc. No. 22) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 1/2/2015. (kpf1)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
UGBE OJILE,
Petitioner,
:
- vs -
Case No. 1:13-cv-844
District Judge Michael R. Barrett
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
MICK R. OPPY, WARDEN,
Correctional Reception Center,
:
Respondent.
DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE
RECORD
This habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner Ugbe Ojile’s Motion to
Supplement the Record (Doc. No. 22). As he represents it, the supplementation would consist of
two items:
1.
“[A] more legible copy of Exhibit 88 of the Respondent’s Return of Writ” and
2.
“[A] Business Record Affidavit for Flight Records from the Custodian of Records for
Continental Airlines (Debbie Myers) explaining flight records that were introduced as Defense
Exhibit C during Petitioner’s trial (Return of Writ, Doc. No. 13-2, Exhibit 88, PageID 904-20).”
(Motion, Doc. No. 22, PageID 2679.)
More Legible Copy of Exhibit 88
Exhibit 88 as attached to the Return of Writ consists of fourteen pages (PageID 903-16).
1
PageID 903 is a fax cover sheet from Allyson Hawkins in the Legal Department of Continental
Airlines dated June 1, 2011, and purporting to attach a subpoena, a certified records declaration,
and 11 copies of records from Continental’s Documentation Department. Ojile’s proposed
replacement consists of ten pages. It does not include the subpoena, the fax cover sheet, or the
original certified records declaration. Some of the pages of the proposed substitution are plainly
not copies of the pages in Exhibit 88. See, for example, PageID 2693 and 2698. Finally, the
Court has no difficulty with the legibility of Exhibit 88 in the current record. Branch 1 of the
Motion is denied.
2.
Affidavit of Debbie Myers
Ojile also seeks to add to the record the Affidavit of Debbie Myers explaining the
Continental Airlines documentation. Her Affidavit is seven single-spaced pages long and is
dated September 9, 2014 (PageID 2683-89).
On February 12, 2014, Ojile filed a prior Motion to Supplement the Record (Doc. No. 8)
seeking to add a prior Affidavit from Ms. Myers dated September 3, 2013 (PageID 110) and a
Declaration of Authenticity of Records from her dated June 1, 2011 (PageID 112). Magistrate
Judge Litkovitz denied this Motion, holding:
[T]his Court is not permitted to consider evidence outside the statecourt record in assessing, under the applicable the standard of
review set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d), whether the state courts'
rulings were contrary to or involved an unreasonable application of
clearly-established Supreme Court precedents, or were based on an
unreasonable determination of the facts. See Cullen v. Pinholster,
131 S.Ct. 1388, 1398 (2011); see also Keeling v. Warden, Lebanon
Carr. Inst., 673 F.3d 452, 464 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 133 S.Ct.
141 (2012); Robinson v. Howes, 663 F.3d 819, 823 (6th Cir. 2011);
Sheppard v. Bagley, 657 F.3d 338, 343-44 (6th Cir. 2011). Cf
2
Barton v. Warden, Southern Ohio Corr. Facility, No. 1:09cv353,
2011 WL 2293225, at *4-5 (S.D. Ohio June 8, 2011) (Merz, M.J.)
(vacating order granting an evidentiary hearing in a§ 2254 habeas
case in light of Pinholster).
(Order, Doc. No. 17, PageID 2616-17.)
The law cited by Judge Litkovitz continues to be binding precedent in this Court. Ojile
argues that Pinholster did not purport to affect Habeas Rule 7. It is correct that in Pinholster the
Supreme Court was concerned directly with evidentiary hearings under Habeas Rule 8.
However, the Sixth Circuit has held the limitations in Pinholster apply to expansion of the record
as well as to evidentiary hearings. Moore v. Mitchell, 708 F.3d 760, 780-784 (6th Cir. 2013).
Accordingly, Branch 2 of the Motion is DENIED.
January 2, 2015.
s/ Michael R. Merz
United States Magistrate Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?