Graves v. Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women

Filing 7

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 4 Report and Recommendations signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 3/17/14. IT IS ORDERED that the objections be, and they hereby are, overruled; that the Report and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted as the finding of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus be, and it hereby is, denied as time-barred, and this matter is hereby dismissed from the docket of this court. (eh1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv886 (WOB-KLL) DENISE GRAVES VS. PETITIONER JUDGMENT WARDEN, OHIO REFORMATORY FOR WOMEN RESPONDENT This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. #4), and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by Petitioner (Doc. #6), and the Court having sufficiently considered the matter, and being advised, IT IS ORDERED that the objections be, and they hereby are, overruled; that the Report and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted as the finding of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be, and it hereby is, denied as time-barred, and this matter is hereby dismissed from the docket of this court. A certificate of appealability shall not issue with respect to any of the claims alleged herein. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3), any appeal of this judgment would not be taken in good faith. This 17th day of March, 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?