Johnson v. Ahmed et al

Filing 21

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 19 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 7/11/2014. (mr1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JAMES JOHNSON, III, Plaintiff, vs. FAISAL AHMED, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:13-cv-921 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 19) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on June 17, 2014, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 19). Plaintiff did not file objections. As required by 29 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the relevant filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is hereby ADOPTED; 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim for relief (Doc. 8) is GRANTED; 3. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19), an appeal of any Order adopting it would not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1997); and 4. This matter shall proceed against Defendants Rosie Clagg and Dr. Faisal Ahmed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 7/11/14 /s/ Timothy S. Black Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?