Younker v. Ohio State Patrol et al

Filing 9

JUDGMENT entered by Clerk affirming Court Order 8 . (km1)

AO450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN

DISTRICT OF

OHIO

AARON D. YOUNKER,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Plaintiff,

V.
Case Number: 1:14-cv-00110

OHIO STATE PATROL, et al.,
Defendants.

G Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has
rendered its verdict.

✔
G Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and
a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
...the Court ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in all respects (doc. 6)
Plaintiff's Complaint, which the Court finds to be frivolous, is hereby DIMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and Plaintiff is
ADVISED that if he continues to file lawsuits with this Court that are subject to dismissal on screening, he may be
subject to sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 as a vexatious litigator. We note that Plaintiff was granted leave to
proceed in this matter in forma pauperis by the Magistrate Judge 4 . The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this
Order would not be taken in good faith for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation;
any application made to this Court to appeal in forma pauperis thus will be DENIED. As a non-prisoner, however,
pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5), Plaintiff is free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

3/24/2014
Date

JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK
Clerk

s/Kevin Moser
(By) Deputy Clerk