Stringer v. Warden, Hocking Correctional Facility

Filing 14

JUDGMENT adopting 11 Report and Recommendations signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 8/12/2015. Petitioners 3 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by procedural defaul t. A certificate of appealability shall not issue with respect to any of the claims alleged herein. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3), any appeal of this judgment would be objectively frivolous and petitioner therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14cv336 (WOB-MRM)
WILLIAM STRINGER

PETITIONER

VS.

JUDGMENT

WARDEN, HOCKING
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

RESPONDENT

This matter is before the Court on the Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. #11),
and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by
Petitioner (Doc. #13), and the Court being sufficiently advised,
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #11)
be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and
conclusions of law of this Court; that petitioner’s Petition for
a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. #3),
is DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by procedural default. A
certificate of appealability shall not issue with respect to any
of the claims alleged herein. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(a)(3), any appeal of this judgment would be objectively
frivolous and petitioner

therefore should not be permitted to

proceed in forma pauperis.
This 12th day of August, 2015.