Applegate v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 14 Report and Recommendations: plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of prosecution. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a) that an appeal of this Order will no t be taken in good faith, therefore, DENYING plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 2/19/2015. (jlw1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Regina Applegate, : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff(s), vs. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant(s). Case Number: 1:14cv498 Judge Susan J. Dlott ORDER The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on January 26, 2015 (Doc. 14), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired February 12, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of prosecution. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a) that an appeal of this Order will not be taken in good faith, therefore, DENYING plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. See Calliham v. Schneider, 178 F.3d800, 803 (6th Cir. 1990), overruling in part Floyd v. United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274, 277 (6th Cir. 1997). IT IS SO ORDERED. ___s/Susan J. Dlott___________ Judge Susan J. Dlott United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?