Shabazz et al v. Xerox et al

Filing 11

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 8 ; All of plaintiffs claims against all named defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to comply with Rule 8 and for failure to state a claim. Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 8/21/14. (mb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Elikim S. Shabazz, et al.,
Plaintiffs
v.

Case No. 1:14-cv-578

Xerox, et al.,
Defendants

ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation filed July 23, 2014 (Doc. 8).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C),
including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file
objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States
v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections
to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation correct.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. All of plaintiffs’ claims against all named
defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to comply with Rule 8 and for
failure to state a claim.

Date: August 21, 2014

s/Sandra S. Beckwith
Sandra S. Beckwith, Senior Judge
United States District Court