Spencer v. Morgan et al
Filing
103
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 100 Report and Recommendation denying 75 and 90 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief; denying 89 and 98 Motions to Amend Complaint. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/12/16. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Jermaine Spencer,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:14cv696
Donald Morgan, et al.,
Judge Michael R. Barrett
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate
Judge on November 21, 2016 (Doc. 100).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including
notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and
Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 100) have been filed.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 100) of the
Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff's second motion for preliminary injunctive
relief (Doc. 75) is DENIED; Plaintiff's motions to amend/correct his complaint (Docs. 89 and 98)
are DENIED consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge as untimely; Plaintiff's
motion/pleas for the Court's assistance to stop retaliation and discrimination (Doc. 90) as
construed as a third motion for preliminary injunctive relief, is also DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett
Michael R. Barrett
United States District Judge
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?