Wilson v. Bridgewell Hospital/Evergreen Southwest Behavioral Health et al

Filing 17

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 11 Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's case be DISMISSED for want of prosecution and for failure to obey a Court Order; and that this case be CLOSED. Objections to R&R due by 3/2/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 2/11/2015. (km1) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ANDREA WILSON, Case No. 1:14-cv-757 Plaintiff, Beckwith, J. Bowman, M.J. vs. BRIDGWELL HOSPITAL/EVERGREEN SOUTHWEST BEHAVIOR HEALTH, et al., Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On November 25 and December 4, 2014, the Court Ordered Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, within TWENTY (20) DAYS, why Defendants’ motions to dismiss (Docs. 8, 11) should be construed as unopposed and granted for the reasons stated therein. (Doc. 12, 13). To date, Plaintiff has not filed a response in opposition to either of Defendants’ motions to dismiss nor has she responded to the pending Show Cause Orders. Plaintiff's failure to prosecute this matter and to obey an Order of the Court warrants dismissal of this case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). See Jourdan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108, 109–10 (6th Cir.1991). District courts have the power to sua sponte dismiss civil actions for want of prosecution to “manage their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 630–31, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). See also Jourdan, 951 F.2d at 109. Though plaintiff is proceeding pro se, as stated by the Supreme Court, “we have never suggested that procedural rules in ordinary civil litigation should be interpreted so as to excuse mistakes by those who proceed without counsel.” McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 113 (1993). Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's case be DISMISSED for want of prosecution and for failure to obey a Court Order; and that this case be CLOSED. s/ Stephanie K. Bowman Stephanie K. Bowman United States Magistrate Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ANDREA WILSON, Case No. 1:14-cv-757 Plaintiff, Beckwith, J. Bowman, M.J. vs. BRIDGWELL HOSPITAL/EVERGREEN SOUTHWEST BEHAVIOR HEALTH, et al., Defendants. NOTICE Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to this Report & Recommendation (“R&R”) within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS after being served with a copy thereof. That period may be extended further by the Court on timely motion by either side for an extension of time. All objections shall specify the portion(s) of the R&R objected to, and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. A party shall respond to an opponent’s objections within FOURTEEN DAYS after being served with a copy of those objections. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?