Steinmetz v. Harrison et al
Filing
15
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 10 ). Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Crutchfield, Mohr, Frye, and John Doe are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/5/2014. (mr1)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
MATTHEW FRANKLIN STEINMETZ,
Plaintiff,
vs.
OFFICER HARRISON, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 1:14-cv-829
Judge Timothy S. Black
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
(Doc. 10)
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United
States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate
Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on November 13, 2014, submitted
a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 10). No objections were filed.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed
the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the
filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that
such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Crutchfield, Mohr, Frye, and John Doe
are DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: 12/5/14
/s/ Timothy S. Black
Timothy S. Black
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?