Martin v. Ohio, State of

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that an appeal of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith, therefore, denying plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1997).. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 3/11/2015. (jlw1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

Howard E. Martin, III,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
Ohio, State of,
Defendant(s).

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Case Number: 1:14cv899
Judge Susan J. Dlott

ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Karen L. Litkovitz, United
States Magistrate Judge filed on February 3, 2015 (Doc. 6), to whom this case was referred
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the
time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired February 20, 2015, hereby
ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1).
The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that an appeal of any Order adopting
the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith, therefore, denying plaintiff leave
to appeal in forma pauperis. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1997).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

___s/Susan J. Dlott___________
Judge Susan J. Dlott
United States District Court