Thompson v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al

Filing 36

ORDER ADOPTING 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on June 19, 2015 (Doc. 31), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired July 9, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, plaintiffs motions for a prelimi nary injunction and/or temporary restraining order (Docs. 20 and 23) are DENIED. Plaintiffs motion to supplement the complaint (Doc. 26) is also DENIED.Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 7/21/2015. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

Gerald Thompson,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation
& Correction, et al.,
Defendant(s).

:
:
:
:
:
:

Case Number: 1:14cv935
Judge Susan J. Dlott

:
:
:
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on June 19, 2015 (Doc. 31), to whom this case was referred
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the
time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired July 9, 2015, hereby ADOPTS
said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining
order (Docs. 20 and 23) are DENIED. Plaintiff’s motion to supplement the complaint (Doc. 26)
is also DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

___s/Susan J. Dlott___________
Judge Susan J. Dlott
United States District Court