Thompson v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
Filing
84
ORDER ADOPTING 79 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : Accordingly, defendants motion for summary judgment (Doc. 69) is GRANTED. All otherpending motions are DENIED as MOOT (Docs. 59 and 78). This case is hereby TERMINATED fromthe docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 3/23/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Gerald Thompson,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and
Correction, et al.,
Defendant(s).
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case Number: 1:14cv935
Judge Susan J. Dlott
:
:
:
ORDER
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge
Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and
filed with this Court on February 1, 2017 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 79). Subsequently, the
plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (82) and the defendant filed a response to
the objections (Doc. 83).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de
novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that
such Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 69) is GRANTED. All other
pending motions are DENIED as MOOT (Docs. 59 and 78). This case is hereby TERMINATED from
the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___s/Susan J. Dlott___________
Judge Susan J. Dlott
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?