Thompson v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al

Filing 84

ORDER ADOPTING 79 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : Accordingly, defendants motion for summary judgment (Doc. 69) is GRANTED. All otherpending motions are DENIED as MOOT (Docs. 59 and 78). This case is hereby TERMINATED fromthe docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 3/23/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Gerald Thompson, Plaintiff(s), vs. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, et al., Defendant(s). : : : : : : Case Number: 1:14cv935 Judge Susan J. Dlott : : : ORDER This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on February 1, 2017 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 79). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (82) and the defendant filed a response to the objections (Doc. 83). The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 69) is GRANTED. All other pending motions are DENIED as MOOT (Docs. 59 and 78). This case is hereby TERMINATED from the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___s/Susan J. Dlott___________ Judge Susan J. Dlott United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?