Rutherford v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility et al

Filing 15

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 5 Report and Recommendation; defendants Morgan, Green, Col, Nolan and Williamson are dismissed as named Defendants; any ruling re 7 Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint shall be made by the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 5/18/15. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION KENNETH J. RUTHERFORD, JR., Case No.: 1:15CV164 PLAINTIFF, Judge Michael R. Barrett v. WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., DEFENDANTS. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on March 23, 2015. (Doc. 5). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 6348 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have been filed. Upon review, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) is ADOPTED. Consistent with the Report and Recommendation, the following claims are hereby DISMISSED: (1) plaintiff’s claims for injunctive relief; (2) any claim against defendants Jackson and Williamson based on allegations of a verbal altercation and harassment that occurred at SOCF on July 3, 2014; (3) any claims against defendants Jackson and Williamson based on allegations that Jackson “fabricated a story,” which was corroborated by Williamson, to justify his use of force against plaintiff on July 3, 2014; (4) any claim against defendants Morgan, Greene, Cool, Nolan or Williamson based on any of the incidents that form the bases 1 for plaintiff’s claims that have been allowed to proceed against the other named defendants; and (5) plaintiff’s conclusory claim that he has “been a target” of harassment ever since he was first placed in state custody and that after an incident that occurred in September 2008, he has “been tortured, set up, sexually assaulted, harassed, and racially profiled.” Further, the defendants Morgan, Greene, Cool, Nolan, and Williamson are hereby DISMISSED as named Defendants in this action consistent with the Report. Any ruling on Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. 7) will be made subsequent to this Order by the Magistrate Judge. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Michael R. Barrett JUDGE MICHAEL R. BARRETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?