Park v. Morgan et al
Filing
10
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 5 and 9 Report and Recommendations dismissing 4 and 8 Complaint and Amended Compliant. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 6/25/15. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Walter E. Park, III,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:15cv182
Donald Morgan, et al.,
Judge Michael R. Barrett
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendations filed by the
Magistrate Judge on April 10, 2015 and May 26, 2015 (Docs. 5 and 9).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including
notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report
and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.
1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation have been
filed.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate
Judge (Docs. 5 and 9) are hereby ADOPTED.
The Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 4) and
Amended Complaint (Doc. 8) as allowed by prior order are DISMISSED with prejudice
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any request for certificate of appealability or
request to appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith and would be denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett
Michael R. Barrett
United States District Judge
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?