Park v. Morgan et al

Filing 10

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 5 and 9 Report and Recommendations dismissing 4 and 8 Complaint and Amended Compliant. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 6/25/15. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Walter E. Park, III, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:15cv182 Donald Morgan, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendations filed by the Magistrate Judge on April 10, 2015 and May 26, 2015 (Docs. 5 and 9). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Docs. 5 and 9) are hereby ADOPTED. The Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 4) and Amended Complaint (Doc. 8) as allowed by prior order are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any request for certificate of appealability or request to appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith and would be denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?