Hancock v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 16 . The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings. Should a reviewing court disagree with this decision, it is alternatively ORDERED that this case is REMANDED under sentence six with the Court to retain jurisdiction until administrative proceedings have been concluded. Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 7/25/16. (mb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Brian Hancock,
Plaintiff
v.

Case No. 1:15-cv-198

Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant

ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation filed June 28, 2016 (Doc. 16).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C),
including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file
objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States
v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections
to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation correct.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The decision of the Commissioner is
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four
of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Should a reviewing court disagree with this decision, it is
alternatively ORDERED that this case is REMANDED under sentence six with the
Court to retain jurisdiction until administrative proceedings have been concluded.

Date: July 25, 2016

s/Sandra S. Beckwith
Sandra S. Beckwith, Senior Judge
United States District Court