Felder v. Ohio State Highway Patrol

Filing 23

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 20 ; dismissing the complaint; denying plaintiff leave to appeal IFP. Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 2/3/16. (mb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

Jeffrey L. Felder, Jr.,
Plaintiff
v.

Case No. 1:15-cv-218

Ohio State Highway Patrol,
Defendant

ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation filed January 6, 2016 (Doc. 20).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C),
including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file
objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States
v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections
to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation correct.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with
prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to obey a Court order.
This Court certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) an appeal of this
Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore DENIES plaintiff leave to
appeal in forma pauperis. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a); Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d
949, 952 (6th Cir. 1997).

Date: February 3, 2016

s/Sandra S. Beckwith
Sandra S. Beckwith, Senior Judge
United States District Court

2