DeNoma v. Kasich et al

Filing 61

ORDER adopting 58 Report and Recommendations. Defendantss motions to dismiss (Docs. 37 and 38 ) are GRANTED with all remaining claims in this case to be DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's motions for an injunction and for an order to freeze all assets, construed as motions seeking preliminary injunctive relief, (Docs. 4 and 5 ) are DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 6/15/2016. (jee)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Anthony J. Denoma, Plaintiff(s), vs. Governor John R. Kasich, et al., Defendant(s). : : : : : : : : : Case Number: 1:15cv594 Judge Susan J. Dlott ORDER The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on May 5, 2016 (Doc. 58), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired May 23, 2016, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, defendants’ motions to dismiss (Docs. 37 and 38) are GRANTED with all remaining claims in this case to be DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff’s motions for an injunction and for an order to freeze all assets, construed as motions seeking preliminary injunctive relief, (Docs. 4 and 5) are DENIED. This case is hereby TERMINATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___s/Susan J. Dlott___________ Judge Susan J. Dlott United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?