DeNoma v. Kasich et al
Filing
61
ORDER adopting 58 Report and Recommendations. Defendantss motions to dismiss (Docs. 37 and 38 ) are GRANTED with all remaining claims in this case to be DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's motions for an injunction and for an order to freeze all assets, construed as motions seeking preliminary injunctive relief, (Docs. 4 and 5 ) are DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 6/15/2016. (jee)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Anthony J. Denoma,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
Governor John R. Kasich, et al.,
Defendant(s).
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case Number: 1:15cv594
Judge Susan J. Dlott
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Stephanie K. Bowman filed on May 5, 2016 (Doc. 58), to whom this case was referred pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing
such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired May 23, 2016, hereby ADOPTS said Report
and Recommendation.
Accordingly, defendants’ motions to dismiss (Docs. 37 and 38) are GRANTED with all
remaining claims in this case to be DISMISSED with prejudice.
Plaintiff’s motions for an injunction and for an order to freeze all assets, construed as
motions seeking preliminary injunctive relief, (Docs. 4 and 5) are DENIED.
This case is hereby TERMINATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___s/Susan J. Dlott___________
Judge Susan J. Dlott
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?