Mattingly et al v. Humana Health Plan, Inc. et al

Filing 31

ORDER ADOPTING 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on May 3, 2016 (Doc. 18), to whom this case was referredpursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636 (b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired May 20, 2016, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, defendants motion to dismiss (Doc. 10) is DENIED without prejudice as moot. Drake v. City of Detroit, 266 Fed. Appx 444,448 (6th Cir. 2008).. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 6/13/2016. (jlw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

Michael W. Mattingly, et al.,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
Humana Health Plan, Inc.,
Defendant(s).

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Case Number: 1:15cv781
Judge Susan J. Dlott

ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on May 3, 2016 (Doc. 18), to whom this case was referred
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the
time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired May 20, 2016, hereby
ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 10) is DENIED without prejudice as
moot. Drake v. City of Detroit, 266 Fed. App’x 444,448 (6th Cir. 2008).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

___s/Susan J. Dlott___________
Judge Susan J. Dlott
United States District Court