Mohammed v. Verst Group Logistics
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 26) is GRANTED. An appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore Plaintiff is DENIED leave to appe al in forma pauperis. This case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 6/1/17. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
AL-MAHDI FARAD MOHAMMED,
VERST GROUP LOGISTICS,
Case No. 1:16-cv-333
Judge Timothy S. Black
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz
DECISION AND ENTRY
ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 31)
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United
States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate
Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on April 21, 2017 submitted a
Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 31). No objections were filed.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has
reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all
of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does
determine that such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in its
1. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 26) is GRANTED;
2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), any appeal of this Order would not
be taken in good faith and therefore Plaintiff is DENIED leave to appeal in
forma pauperis; and
3. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is
TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Timothy S. Black
Timothy S. Black
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?