Thomas v. Ohio State of et al
Filing
60
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 55 ) and TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 7/31/18. (jlm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
MARCOS THOMAS,
Plaintiff,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
vs.
STATE OF OHIO, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 1:16-cv-473
Judge Timothy S. Black
Magistrate Judge Stephanie K.
Bowman
DECISION AND ENTRY
ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 55) and
TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United
States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the
Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on June 12, 2018,
submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 55). Plaintiff filed an objection
(“Objection”). (Doc. 56).
1
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has
reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all
of the filings in this matter. Upon considering the foregoing, the Court does determine
that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly:
1
Plaintiff’s Objection is not well-taken as it fails to identify any issue of material fact that would
justify denying Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
1.
The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 55) is ADOPTED;
2.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 49) is GRANTED;
3.
Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. 56) is OVERRULED; and
4.
The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is
TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date:
7/31/18
Timothy S. Black
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?