McDougald v. Ahmad
Filing
34
ORDER ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Accordingly, the motion of Defendant Ahmed for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12 ( c ) for failure to state a claim, (Doc. 22) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 9/8/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Jerone McDougald,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
Dr. Faisal Ahmad,
Defendant(s).
Case Number: 1:16cv500
Judge Susan J. Dlott
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on April 26, 2017 (Doc. 27), to whom this case was referred
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the
time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired June 10, 2017, hereby
ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
The Report and Recommendation was mailed to Mr. McDougald on April 26, 2017 by
regular mail. On May 8, 2017, the envelope was returned to the Clerk’s Office stating the
inmate refused the mail (Doc. 28).
Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file objections to the Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 29) which the Court granted giving plaintiff until June 10, 2017 to file
his objections even though plaintiff had originally refused to accept the mail.
Plaintiff again filed a motion on June 12, 2017 for an extension of time to submit
objections for 21 days (Doc. 33). The Court DENIES that motion.
Accordingly, the motion of Defendant Ahmed for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to
Rule 12 ( c ) for failure to state a claim, (Doc. 22) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___s/Susan J. Dlott___________
Judge Susan J. Dlott
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?