Pullen v. Cool et al
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 64 Report and Recommendation denying 44 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 44 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; denying 45 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 58 M otion to Issue Service; Defendants C/O Dail, C/O Johnson, C/O Rodgers and C/O Ferguson are dismissed for lack of service. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 11/27/17. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr.,
Case No. 1:16cv515
William Cool, et al.,
Judge Michael R. Barrett
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge
on September 28, 2017 (Doc. 64).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that
the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation
in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the
Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 64) of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff’s
Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order/Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 45) is DENIED; Plaintiff’s
Motion for Extension of Time to Issue Service (Doc. 44) is DENIED; and defendants C/O Dail, C/O
Johnson, C/O Rodgers and C/O Ferguson are DISMISSED for lack of service; and Plaintiff’s Motion to
Issue Service on Jamie Gillum, Kory Rogers, Kody Johnson and ODRC (Doc. 58) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett
Michael R. Barrett
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?