Pullen v. Cool et al

Filing 75

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 64 Report and Recommendation denying 44 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 44 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; denying 45 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 58 M otion to Issue Service; Defendants C/O Dail, C/O Johnson, C/O Rodgers and C/O Ferguson are dismissed for lack of service. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 11/27/17. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:16cv515 William Cool, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on September 28, 2017 (Doc. 64). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 64) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order/Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 45) is DENIED; Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Issue Service (Doc. 44) is DENIED; and defendants C/O Dail, C/O Johnson, C/O Rodgers and C/O Ferguson are DISMISSED for lack of service; and Plaintiff’s Motion to Issue Service on Jamie Gillum, Kory Rogers, Kody Johnson and ODRC (Doc. 58) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?