Prophet v. Belflex Corporate
Filing
8
ORDER by Judge Susan J. Dlott ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION dismissing plaintiff's complaint. (vp)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Derrick D. Prophet,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
Belflex Corporate,
Defendant(s).
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case Number: 1:16cv603
Judge Susan J. Dlott
ORDER
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen
L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this
Court on June 6, 2016 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections
to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de
novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that
such Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED.
The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any
Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith and therefore DENIES
plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in
the Court of Appeals. See Calliham v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999), overruling in part
Floyd v. United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274, 277 (6th Cir. 1997).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___s/Susan J. Dlott___________
Judge Susan J. Dlott
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?