Ross v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). This case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 9/11/17. (gs)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION BRANDI ROSS, Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:16-cv-739 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Karen Litkovitz DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 17) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court, and, on July 20, 2017, submitted a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 17). No objections were filed. As required by 29 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly: 1. The Report and Recommendations (Doc. 17) is ADOPTED; 2. The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. 9/11/17 Date: ____________ _______________________ Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?