Thompson v. Erdos et al

Filing 42

ORDER adopting 41 Report and Recommendations: the Court does determine 41 Recommendation should be adopted.Accordingly, plaintiffs two latest motions for preliminary injunctive relief (Docs. 34 and 36) are DENIED for the reasons previously stated in the Report and Recommendation of January 18, 2017 and adopted by the court on January 30, 2017 (Docs. 19, 20). Plaintiff is furtherwarned that the filing of repetitive motions will not be tolerated. In the future, repetitive motions will be stricken from the record without further comment. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 9/6/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Gerald Thompson, Plaintiff(s), vs. Warden Erdos, et al., Defendant(s). : : : : : : : : : Case Number: 1:16cv812 Judge Susan J. Dlott ORDER This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on August 1, 2017 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, plaintiff’s two latest motions for preliminary injunctive relief (Docs. 34 and 36) are DENIED for the reasons previously stated in the Report and Recommendation of January 18, 2017 and adopted by the court on January 30, 2017 (Docs. 19, 20). Plaintiff is further warned that the filing of repetitive motions will not be tolerated. In the future, repetitive motions will be stricken from the record without further comment. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___s/Susan J. Dlott___________ Judge Susan J. Dlott United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?