Shearer v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendant's decision to deny Plaintiff's request for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income is AFFIRMED as supported by substantial evidence. This case shall be CLOSED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/16/17. (sct)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION KIMBERLY SHEARER, Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:16-cv-824 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 17) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on July 20, 2017, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 17). No objections were filed. As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendant’s decision to deny Plaintiff’s request for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income is AFFIRMED as supported by substantial evidence. The Clerk shall issue judgment accordingly, whereupon this case shall be CLOSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 8/16/17 __________________________ Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?