Shearer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendant's decision to deny Plaintiff's request for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income is AFFIRMED as supported by substantial evidence. This case shall be CLOSED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/16/17. (sct)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
KIMBERLY SHEARER,
Plaintiff,
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 1:16-cv-824
Judge Timothy S. Black
Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman
DECISION AND ENTRY
ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 17)
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United
States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the
Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on July 20, 2017,
submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 17). No objections were filed.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has
reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all
of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does
determine that such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in its
entirety.
Accordingly, Defendant’s decision to deny Plaintiff’s request for Disability
Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income is AFFIRMED as supported by
substantial evidence. The Clerk shall issue judgment accordingly, whereupon this case
shall be CLOSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: 8/16/17
__________________________
Timothy S. Black
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?